PA
PARKS AMERICA, INC (PRKA)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 FY2024 revenue declined 8.6% year over year to $2.61M, but pre-tax income improved to $0.25M from $0.09M as cost discipline offset softer traffic at Georgia and Texas; total segment EBITDA was $0.83M vs $0.92M last year .
- Segment mix: Missouri grew revenue 13.8% and pre-tax income 27.8% y/y; Georgia and Texas were down y/y on revenue, consistent with heavier competition in GA and lower advertising spend through winter .
- Balance sheet/liquidity: Cash & short-term investments were $3.32M at FY-end; total loan debt fell to $3.50M; post-quarter, Aggieland debt was refinanced with a 10-year loan at Prime–0.50%, smoothing near-term amortization .
- Strategic updates likely to drive stock narrative: (1) Aggieland appraisal of $9.2M ($6.3M land) and a go/no-go decision targeted around FY25 year-end; (2) potential reverse/forward split tied to the next annual meeting, contingent on liquidity; (3) Georgia capex spike in FY25 for a new restaurant, a one-year step-up with multi-year benefit .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Missouri momentum: Q4 revenue $0.72M (+13.8% y/y) and pre-tax income $0.29M (+27.8% y/y), signaling operating leverage as the park scales .
- Profitability inflection: Consolidated pre-tax income rose to $0.25M in Q4 from $0.09M a year ago despite lower revenue, reflecting tighter costs and lower corporate expense in the quarter .
- Debt optimization: Aggieland refinanced on 9/30/24 with a 10-year term, Prime–0.50% rate and 15-year amortization, replacing the prior loan and easing cash outflows (subsequent event) .
- Quote: “We... refinanc[ed] a loan... that event happened right after the end of the quarter... it's going to have some slight differences... versus what you see in the balance sheet” .
What Went Wrong
- Georgia softness: Q4 GA revenue fell to $1.47M from $1.77M y/y; GA revenue remains below pre-tornado/pro-COVID peaks amid increased competition and previously ineffective advertising .
- Texas down: Q4 TX revenue declined to $0.42M from $0.45M y/y; management reiterated challenges around location-driven demand and high capital intensity .
- Elevated FY unusual costs: FY24 carried $2.04M in contested proxy expenses and a $75k legal settlement, masking underlying segment improvements; working capital fell to $1.60M from $3.69M y/y .
Financial Results
Consolidated quarterly trend
Notes: The company did not disclose net income or EPS for Q4 in its 8-K/press materials; Q4 includes segment EBITDA, corporate expenses, and pre-tax income .
Q4 2024 vs Q4 2023 – segment revenue and pre-tax income
KPIs and balance sheet indicators
Notes: FY-end total loan debt disclosed as $3.50M in 10-K narrative (rounded) . As of 6/30/24, total debt was $3.65M per Q3 press release . Post-quarter refinancing of Aggieland (Prime–0.50%, 10-year term, 15-year amortization) completed 9/30/24 .
Estimates vs actuals
- Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q4 2024 EPS and revenue was not available; PRKA has limited sell-side coverage. No estimate comparison provided (consensus unavailable).
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Aggieland appraised for $9.2 million, of which $6.3 million was land… improvements may not necessarily be worth their cost to reproduce” .
- “Advertising was less than normal… you won’t really see a pickup until around spring break… February might be the first month that looks like it’s a normal sort of level” .
- “The reverse split… is a very, very high priority… but it is a second priority to having an appropriate liquidity level… earliest formal notice could be as early as January… meeting could be as late as early March” .
- “Capital spending with Georgia will be huge for the next year… the restaurant project alone is [akin to] an entire year’s worth of CapEx” .
- “Competition [in Georgia/Alabama] increased… advertising effectiveness… very poor… advertising declined 19%” .
Q&A Highlights
- Aggieland appraisal and timeline: $9.2M appraisal ($6.3M land); decision around FY25 year-end; potential operational wind-down ahead of any sale .
- Reverse/forward split mechanics: Most likely at the annual meeting; needs >50% of shares outstanding to vote; fractional buyouts act like a targeted buyback; contingent on cash levels .
- Missouri profitability path: Greater scalability and higher ceiling than Texas; EBITDA margins can expand with sales; key is execution, not further cost cuts .
- Georgia investment case: Long underinvested; FY25 will have elevated capex (restaurant), intended to reset value proposition .
- Run-rate caution: Don’t expect a near-term sales pickup without ad ramp; seasonality means meaningful changes show from spring onward .
Estimates Context
- Consensus (S&P Global) for Q4 FY2024 EPS and revenue was not available; PRKA has minimal sell-side coverage. As a result, we cannot provide a vs-consensus comparison for the quarter (consensus unavailable).
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Missouri is the current growth engine; continued revenue gains there should translate into outsized EBITDA margin expansion given operating leverage .
- Georgia will be capex-heavy in FY25 (restaurant); watch for improved guest value proposition and ad ramp by spring to re-accelerate attendance .
- Aggieland is under active review; an asset sale could unlock cash and simplify the footprint, but timing and wind-down lead times imply a multi-quarter process .
- The reverse/forward split could rationalize the shareholder base and potentially improve trading dynamics, but only if liquidity is ample; earliest formal steps align with the next annual meeting cycle .
- Balance sheet is stable with $3.32M cash/ST investments and $3.50M total loan debt at FY-end; Aggieland refinancing extends tenor and reduces near-term cash burden .
- Near-term trading: Expect seasonally weak months and muted ad spend through winter; KPI inflection likely from March (spring break) as ad spend normalizes and new pricing/marketing at Aggieland is tested .
- Medium-term thesis: Clean capital allocation (potential TX action), focused reinvestment in GA, and MO growth provide a credible path to improved consolidated margins once one-time expenses subside .